Dodge Cummins Diesel Forum banner
1 - 6 of 6 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
975 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Can you imagine a 30% increase in torque on a Cummins engine and what that would do to efficiency? Wow!

 

· Super Moderator
99 qclb, 325dap, compound. Billet trans, 37 toyo, lockers, winch, 10kw stereo, quadzilla
Joined
·
5,045 Posts
cries in 47RE...

Seriously though I don't see how our connecting rod could possibly change that kind of torque. If you stroke it sure, but just changing the type of rod. Your total travel distance is going to remain the same.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
975 Posts
Discussion Starter · #5 ·
Good point.
 

· Super Moderator
99 qclb, 325dap, compound. Billet trans, 37 toyo, lockers, winch, 10kw stereo, quadzilla
Joined
·
5,045 Posts
Okay I can see the rod angle. So you would have less losses due to lateral loading. You would also have more stable cylinder positions as they're not trying to cantalever into the walls.

So we'd be talking about some very low percentage gains on efficiency. Which would make sense. With higher RPM that would be amplified, so as to allow for more stable operation at 4000+ RPM.

I suppose that makes sense, were making gains indirectly on horsepower
 
1 - 6 of 6 Posts
Top