Joined
·
1,168 Posts
Then step up and roll those dice!
Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk
Then step up and roll those dice!
what exactly is speculation?Data please...anything else is speculation and conjecture.
Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk
Motor killing!what exactly is speculation?
ppl please understand that am not looking to gain a single hp doing this. Not looking to roll coal or do crazy burnouts. I'm simply trying to prolong the life of the engine. Nothing I do should cause harm to the motor in fact I am prolonging the life of it. I know there are ppl that tune 200+ or whatever. The first 6.7 didn't even have DEF. It isn't crazy to expect coverage within the reasonable timeframe on a new car. But I guess I am rolling those dice. Wish me luck boys
shadow87,I appreciate everyones input btw. I mean it. If one can't take criticism, one is narrow minded. I still have time to think, And there is a lot to think about.
I'll address these one at a time.Think about it, you are putting exhaust into your intake, dumping oil from the ccv into your turbo, and creating a massive amount of back pressure with the exhaust after treatment system. That is going to kill the motor sooner than later.
Raw fuel is still injected into the cylinder on the exhaust stroke during a regen to clean the DPF.As was stated earlier the newer trucks emissions systems are much easier on the engines than the older ones. They use a lot less EGR and don't dump excess fuel into the cylinders to burn soot, instead using Urea injected into the SCR. I am pro delete but not until I have an issue then I will have to weigh out what warranty I have left versus cost of emissions repair if not covered. I'm not brave enough to delete a brand new truck and run the risk of a major failure.
Proof? I mean really...is this opinion or fact?Think about it, you are putting exhaust into your intake, dumping oil from the ccv into your turbo, and creating a massive amount of back pressure with the exhaust after treatment system. That is going to kill the motor sooner than later.
considering that their sole purpose is for emissions, and that they do reduce power(both facts), one can assume that there's a greater probobility of you doing better without.Proof? I mean really...is this opinion or fact?
I would respectably advise you to do some research on ccv and egr, because you are leaving out a lot. there is a lot of damage. as far as dpf and the def system yes the engine can handle a lot but there is a difference in load and back pressure.I'll address these one at a time.
1) Exhaust into the intake: this used to be a problem in sooting up the grid heater. I don't know if this is still a problem or not, but the EGR is much less on these DEF trucks.
2) CCV oil into the turbo: the problem with this is the possibility of coating the inside of your intercooler. This will reduce the heat exchange rate of the intercooler BUT will increase your combustion efficiency - not going to kill anything with this.
3) Exhaust after treatment back pressure: You do realize the pressures the combustion chambers see? The exhaust back pressure is NOTHING compared to what the engine can handle. Heck if that is your reasoning, get rid of the Variable Geometry Turbo (it creates back pressure too) and DON'T ever use the back pressure exhaust brake (part of the VGT). I could go on about this topic, but I think you get my point.
If you want to delete, you are carrying the warranty (for the most part). Do it or don't but in my humble opinion, there is no need on these new trucks.
Nope...let's not change the narrative. You said these motors will FAIL sooner...that's not the same as being "better off without".considering that their sole purpose is for emissions, and that they do reduce power(both facts), one can assume that there's a greater probobility of you doing better without.
We can debate all night or you can understand what I'm trying to say. I can be wrong sure, but you can't tell me what I meant to say. Its an educated guess. Read the rest of this thread and you will see what Im trying to do.Nope...let's not change the narrative. You said these motors will FAIL sooner...that's not the same as being "better off without".
Reducing emissions and reducing power, although they might be FACTS, the result does not mean engine failure.
From my perspective this is what I see around CF, the sky is falling again...better delete. There's no proof deleting helps extend engine life, but you DO see guys who have deleted start breaking things because by deleting they are doing their own engineering on these drive trains...
HOw often do we see around here threads that go something along these lines:
"Hi guys, I'm having a problem with <whatever engine/transmission component> and oh by the way I am deleted running only a 60hp tune and rarely do I stick my foot in it..."
By INCREASING emissions and INCREASING power they are having powertrain failures. Are they really better off without?
Hey if you want to delete, go right ahead, that's YOUR choice. I have no issue at all with people who delete these trucks. They sound better and get better mileage slightly and can pull a High School off it's foundation. But why would anyone expect FCA to cover the cost of you breaking your truck as a result of your own engineering?
Not sure why you bothered starting the thread if you're just going to shut down the debate when it doesn't agree with you.We can debate all night or you can understand what I'm trying to say. I can be wrong sure, but you can't tell me what I meant to say. Its an educated guess. Read the rest of this thread and you will see what Im trying to do.