FCA Approved Sell its Diesel Vehicles Again - Dodge Cummins Diesel Forum
Cummins Forum News News and CF Staff Updates to the Members. Plans, site changes, things to look forward to, etc. Only staff may start new threads.

  • 2 Post By AutoGuide.com
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 5 (permalink) Old 07-28-2017, 03:10 PM Thread Starter
Sponsored Editorial Content
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 172
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 9 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
FCA Approved Sell its Diesel Vehicles Again

<center><span lang="EN-US"></span></center>

<span lang="EN-US">Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (FCA) has won approval to sell 2017 model year diesel vehicles.

The automaker has been under fire, with U.S. and California regulators alleging FCA’s older vehicles had undisclosed emissions controls, allowing the vehicles to emit excess pollution in normal driving. FCA has refuted the idea and now hopes the software fix it is using on 2017 model year vehicles can be the foundation for a fix on older 2014-2016 diesel vehicles. The company restarted production earlier this month in anticipation of approval and promises the software update will have no effect on the fuel economy ratings or vehicle performance.</span>

<span lang="EN-US">Read more about the FCA's Diesel Vehicles at AutoGuide.com.</span>

AutoGuide.com is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 5 (permalink) Old 07-30-2017, 07:44 AM
Diesel Head
Fanman43's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Utah
Posts: 1,028
Thanks: 681
Thanked 269 Times in 210 Posts
iTrader Score: 1 reviews
"Software Fix"


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 3 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Fanman43 is offline  
post #3 of 5 (permalink) Old 08-03-2017, 01:32 AM
Diesel Freak
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Southern California
Posts: 616
Thanks: 3
Thanked 22 Times in 21 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
does anyone know when the grand Cherokee diesel will be available to order?
Regal2800 is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #4 of 5 (permalink) Old 09-04-2017, 09:21 PM
Diesel Head
El Pozzinator's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Batten Roodje
Posts: 2,405
Thanks: 140
Thanked 316 Times in 281 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
Yeah... because 1970s emissions controls had absolutely zero effect on the efficiency of those engines either. And we all know that removing emissions from later model vehicles has a negative effect on fuel economy...

The only - ONLY - time I've ever seen emissions have a positive effect on anything was with a mid-90s LT4 in an F-body w/ everything in the SLP Catalog thrown at it. Literally. Drag car with a license plate (barely). Exhaust started w/ SLP long tubes. We tried dumps, lakes, dual straights, x-pipe, h-pipe, and stock route Borla collector-back system; all in straight pipe and with cherry bombs. Exhaust design behind the Y-pipe (restricted by body design) is so poor and cylinder scavenging so hampered that the car made better power (chassis dyno confirmed) through the cats. Race cats, granted, but the car needed the backpressure. Much more area under the curve.

Otherwise I've never seen anything improve efficiency of an engine except internal design (reduced parasitic losses) or airflow enhancement. Emissions controls are never "enhancing" to airflow otherwise, so they'll always limit power and thus fuel economy. I'm calling BS on making emissions programming more restrictive having zero effect on real world fuel economy. Maybe in their imaginary 40mph "highway" simulation, but not where real people live and drive.

08 Resistol. Emissions cleaning pending. Anarchy EFI, Sinister coolant filter, Carbonite DP sensor, CSS -2"/+400# springs, reverse level, Amsoil bypass filter, and a pile of boxes in the garage
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 3 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
El Pozzinator is online now  
post #5 of 5 (permalink) Old 09-24-2017, 09:24 PM
Diesel Head
badunit's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,093
Thanks: 5
Thanked 284 Times in 181 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
Originally Posted by El Pozzinator View Post
I'm calling BS on making emissions programming more restrictive having zero effect on real world fuel economy.
Without knowing what was changed, it is not possible to be so sure. For example, what if the change was to change the algorithm they use for DEF injection. That would not affect fuel mileage or performance. It might affect DEF usage but they didn't say anything about that.

2015 2500 Laramie CCSB 4x4 6.7L CTD 68RFE
2014 2500 Laramie CCSB 4x4 6.4L Hemi (Sold in 2015)
2003 2500 QCSB 4x4 5.9L CTD (Sold in 2014)
badunit is offline  
Sponsored Links
Closed Thread

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Dodge Cummins Diesel Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome