- HOME - FORUMS - GARAGE - TECH - ARTICLES - CHAT - CLASSIFIEDS - REVIEWS - VIDEOS - MEMBER MAP - STORE -
- REGISTER - CALENDAR - INFO - SITE HELP - RULES - STAFF - MEMBERSHIP - CONTACT US -


Welcome to the Dodge Cummins Diesel Forum, the fastest growing Dodge Diesel Community on the internet.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us

Go Back   Dodge Cummins Diesel Forum > General Forums > General Diesel Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

General Diesel Discussion Discuss General Topics related to the Cummins , Dodge Rams , Other Diesels Ect....NO ADVERTISING

 
       


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-09-2008, 09:44 PM   #13 (permalink)
Cummins Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: ruidoso new mexico
Posts: 146
i like quiet so i used a donaldson m090535 5"and a fbd 5" turbo back same price as 4" kit
__________________
06 3500 dually, 4X4 qc big horn g56, dynatrac free spin, fitch fuel catalyst, bd exhaust brake, donaldson m90535 muffler, no cat, cfm+,winspeed heater spacer, smarty jr, taylor wings, 9750 luberfiner bypass filter, psm cold air, cool hose, tag, air tab's, pdr cam
carl48 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 05-09-2008, 09:54 PM   #14 (permalink)
Newbie
 
lukeduke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Snowflake AZ
Posts: 16
I don't understand how having back pressure would be a good thing with a turbo. It seems like back pressure would prevent the turbo from spooling as quick as it could if there were no back pressure. I say go with the 5". That is what I would have bought if my MBRP 4" was not already on there when I bought it.
__________________
2006 Dodge Ram MEGA Cab 2500 4x4, leveling kit, 295/70 R17 Toyo M/T's, Edge Juice w/ Attitude, MBRP 4" exhaust, AFE stage 2 intake w/ProGuard 7 filter.
lukeduke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2008, 08:29 AM   #15 (permalink)
Cummins Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: ruidoso new mexico
Posts: 146
you can buy a Donaldson m90535 muffler for $90 and the 5" turbo back piping from fbd for less than $300 this is cheaper than 4", quieter , and no restriction . spool up is a non issue
__________________
06 3500 dually, 4X4 qc big horn g56, dynatrac free spin, fitch fuel catalyst, bd exhaust brake, donaldson m90535 muffler, no cat, cfm+,winspeed heater spacer, smarty jr, taylor wings, 9750 luberfiner bypass filter, psm cold air, cool hose, tag, air tab's, pdr cam
carl48 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2008, 06:22 AM   #16 (permalink)
Cummins Enthusiast
 
terminaltsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Lou-evil KY
Posts: 271
any engine with a turbo wil lperform best with the largest possible, or no exhaust. the turbo itself provides tons of backrpessure; after the turbo, you want the largest size piping you can fit/afford based on your HP goals.
__________________
kawasaki ZX12-R
'99 Dodge 2500 CTD 5 speed, 4x4, Greddy EGT, Edge EZ, BHAF, 4" exhaust, AirDog, running 80-100% biodiesel.
terminaltsi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2008, 09:18 AM   #17 (permalink)
Fabricator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Bristol, CT
Posts: 530
Quote:
Originally Posted by terminaltsi View Post
any engine with a turbo wil lperform best with the largest possible, or no exhaust. the turbo itself provides tons of backrpessure; after the turbo, you want the largest size piping you can fit/afford based on your HP goals.
completly. you want the exhaust to be as free as possible after the turbo, but that brings up another topic of discussion, the outlet in the turbo is 2.75", so when does making the exhaust bigger have no increase on flow. itd be nice to measure the pressure in a 3, 4, and 5" exhaust at WOT.

as far as the 4" down pipe into 5" muffler back, its pointless for performance, if you were going to make a step in sizes you'd want the 5" down pipe into 4" muffler back, as the exhaust gets further from the engine it gets cooler, more dense, basically smaller, so you dont need the larger exhaust toward the end.
__________________
'01 - 2500, 47re 2wd, 53 Block 70k miles and counting.... no cracks
4" turbo-back, 5" single stack - Intake w/ heat shield - Traction bars - AirDog 150 - Edge Juice with Attitude HOT - HX-40 making 35psi - Leveled, rear dropped 2"
14.2 @ 100 6psi boosted lanuch(hx-40 making 35psi)

Last edited by Rollin Coal : 05-11-2008 at 09:24 AM.
Rollin Coal is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2008, 02:21 PM   #18 (permalink)
Ops
Cummins Nut
 
Ops's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Middle of PA
Posts: 413
My rig had a 5" straight pipe on it when I got it. It has a nice deep snarl under throttle, sounds like an 18 wheeler pulling a hill. The down side is a nasty drone at certain throttle settings. I'm considering a 5" resonator in place of the muffler delete pipe.

As far as the theory, less backpressure is better, and yes the pipe can get smaller as the exhaust gases cool.

Ops
__________________
01 QC, tow package, 4X4, 33" BFG's, Edge EZ, 4:10s with LS, 5" straight pipe. Updated May 07: Holley Black on the frame rail, ISSPRO fuel pressure guage. Modified heachache rack, brush guard, 100w driving lights.
Ops is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2008, 02:39 PM   #19 (permalink)
Cummins Enthusiast
 
199eightcummins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Indianpolis
Posts: 300
Exhaust size is only as good as the smallest part it has to go through..
__________________
1998 Dodge 2500 Cummins 5 Spd SB clutch
MODS: AEM intake, 4in TB, gauges,3in intake horn ,bd-boostfooler, Superchips, Aurora 3000 FASS 95, and Vulcan draw straw II
199eightcummins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2008, 02:44 PM   #20 (permalink)
Cummins Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Loveland CO
Posts: 151
Yeah go with the 5'', you'll be happier with in the long run.. I think I would leave the downpipe a 4'' and then 5'' the rest of the way back. good luck
__________________
Too many cars to list. Drag truck is in the plans for next winter as my project.
Cummins 429 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2008, 02:45 PM   #21 (permalink)
Cummins Fan
 
witchdoctor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: alvin, tx
Posts: 92
I'll say this. The size of the pipe on a diesel dictates the TONE that comes out of the end. Larger pipes have a quieter db level and have a deep mellow tone while a 3.5 inch like I have tends to be loud and raspy. 199eightcummins also hit the nail on the head. only as good as the smallest point to travel through.
__________________
04 quad cab 3/4 ton 2 wheel drive long bed. 6 spd tranny with a straight pipe.
witchdoctor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2008, 03:34 PM   #22 (permalink)
Cummins Fan
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: CHAMPAIGN ILLINOIS
Posts: 49
Boy this topic gets kicked around alot. It is all personal prefrence to looks and cost. My 2002 peterbilt c12 435 horse runs a 4 inch downpipe until under the cab. As far as exhaust being only as good as the smallest point, (in refrence to actual turbo outlet) i partly agree with but as the exhaust cools, it also looses velocity which is helped by the free flowing pipe all the way out being the same size. The only way you could see if one was slower to spool than the other is a controled enviroment as a dyno and datalogger to actually know exactly waht rpms spoolup happens. Tim
__________________
98 qc/dually 4x4 12 valve built
Video of truck http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_cpLtX_CWs
ILLINOISRAM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2008, 05:23 AM   #23 (permalink)
Cummins Enthusiast
 
terminaltsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Lou-evil KY
Posts: 271
i actually thought that the piping needed to be larger as it got farther from the turbo, because the heat helps with exhaust velocity, so it can be smaller up front, but as it cools, velocity slows, so it needs larger piping near the rear to keep the flow the same.
__________________
kawasaki ZX12-R
'99 Dodge 2500 CTD 5 speed, 4x4, Greddy EGT, Edge EZ, BHAF, 4" exhaust, AirDog, running 80-100% biodiesel.
terminaltsi is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
vB.Sponsors
  • AutoForums.com
  • Truck
  • European
  • Import
  • Domestic
  • Manufacturer

AutoForums.com is the premier network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
We operate more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share experiences and opinions as a community.

Visit AutoForums.com today.

For advertising information, please visit our AutoForums.com website and Contact Us, or send an email message to sales@autoforums.com.